RWGPS claims 6000m total climb on this route - very strange

Conrad

Conrad

Maximum Pace
Dec 8, 2014
399
221
73
43
#1
I'm going on a short cycling trip around Okinawa in a few days. Amami Oshima is going to be Day 2 and RWGPS is telling me that this route has 6000m total climb?!? This can't be right. Looking at the elevation profile I'm guessing it's about 2000-3000m in total. What do you guys think? Understandably I'd like to get some opinions on this before I jump in head first.

Cheers for your help.
 
Conrad

Conrad

Maximum Pace
Dec 8, 2014
399
221
73
43
#3
That was my impression too. I'll upload the GPX file to my Osmand app and see what info that gives me.

If anyone is interested the route was loosely based on the Amami Oshima Challenge 160k route.
 
D'Pioneer

D'Pioneer

Far beyond the black horizon
Oct 9, 2015
458
229
83
#4
Yeah, if you manually add up the total height of the peaks, which are all between 200m and 400m each, it gives a rough guide of about 3,000m, so no idea where 6000m comes into it. Unless you have clicked a magic button that has you going round the loop twice?

Pretty mad island you are off to!
 
dastott

dastott

Speeding Up
May 10, 2012
85
28
38
Fukuoka
#5
Have had strange issues with elevation gain data myself using RWGPS. I don't use it much (find Garmin Connect much easier to use) but IIRC there is a button to re-calculate or re-scan the course.
 
Half-Fast Mike

Half-Fast Mike

Maximum Pace
May 22, 2007
3,688
1,598
143
Kawasaki
halffastcycling.com
#6
Many of those peaks - the ones with 30%+ gradients on both sides - are tunnels.

There's a very slight mismatch between the Google maps map (made by Zenrin) and the corresponding elevation data set. The result is that, in uneven terrain, even though a road is smooth, auto-plotting a route along it in RWGPS and some other services gives a continuous series of jagged ups and downs, and all the ups get totalled in the elevation summary you see.

I reckon you'll have 1450 m of actual noticeable climbing on that route.
 
Last edited:
Likes: Heath
Conrad

Conrad

Maximum Pace
Dec 8, 2014
399
221
73
43
#8
Many of those peaks - the ones with 30%+ gradients on both sides - are tunnels.

There's a very slight mismatch between the Google maps map (made by Zenrin) and the corresponding elevation data set.
Thanks for the technical explanation, it certainly goes some way to explaining how RWGPS can be out so much at times.
Here's the route I settled on, I managed to squeeze in some more coastal riding and a few more squiggly mountain bits. early the next morning I'll be on a ferry for Tokunoshima. I'm sorting that route out now.
 
Conrad

Conrad

Maximum Pace
Dec 8, 2014
399
221
73
43
#9
Would be very interested to hear about the event
I'm not actually riding in an event. That race is held in November, I just based my course roughly on their route, but I'll def post happy snaps etc on my return.
 
macrophotofly

macrophotofly

Maximum Pace
Aug 27, 2012
581
234
73
London, UK
www.macrophotofly.com
#10
RWGPS now has a feature to re-calculate routes incorporating the tunnels. Haven't used it myself as I find leaving the peaks in is a good way of encouraging the right riders to turn up for the ride;)